The War Against Intelligence: Bias, Belief, and the Battle Over Origins
In theory, science is supposed to be an open pursuit of truth — a discipline grounded in observation, repeatable testing, and honest evaluation of evidence. Its strength lies in following the facts wherever they lead. Yet when it comes to the question of origins — particularly the debate between evolution and intelligent design — the scientific and academic communities often operate very differently. Rather than open inquiry, there is frequently evidence of strong ideological bias, professional gatekeeping, and institutional resistance toward any conclusion that points to design or a Creator. This raises a critical question: Has the debate over origins ceased to be purely scientific and instead become philosophical — or even religious — in nature? Science vs. Scientism True science relies on: - Observation - Testability - Repeatability - Evidence-based conclusions However, many scholars distinguish between science and scientism. Science seeks truth. Scientism begins with a philos...